MORTGAGE RATES REPORT

Mortgages For Condominium Complexes With Commercial Businesses (Mixed-Use)

Some mortgage lenders eschew condominium complexes which have a portion of the complex leased to commercial businesses.  For example, in Pacific Beach (San Diego), there is a property with 8 units on top of a 2200 square foot, retail business.  Why won't lenders make a loan there?

Both FHA & conventional financing permit a certain amount of the property, to lease commercial space.  Fannie Mae allows for 20% of the property to be leased to commercial ventures as does Freddie Mac.  FHA allows for up to 25% of the square footage to be leased commercially.

If the commercial space is more than the permitted percentage of the project, or it's being advertised as a condo-tel, or the public liability insurance doesn't cover the commercial spaces that are owned by the HOA, the loan can be funded.

In our Pacific Beach example, each of the eight units is approximately 975 square feet, for a total of 7800 square feet.  The retail space is 2200 square feet.  The commercial lease is 22% of the toal square footage of the complex.  It is not eligibile for Fannie mae or Freddie Mac financing but is eligible for FHA financing.

What We Know About the HARP Refinance Program, As Of November 28,2011

The HARP Refinance loan program is still unclear but the basic gist of the plan is that, if a borrower is refinancing into a fixed-rate home loan, there will be no equity requirement.  Stated differently, the appraised value won't matter; the government loan program wants to help borrowers get fixed-rate loans which they can afford.  If the new loan is an adjustable rate mortgage (ARM), the maximum LTV will be 105% of the appraised value. 

An Automated Valuation Model (AVM) will be the preferred valuation determination but a full appraisal may be required.  There are no restrictions to the amount of negative equity . A home owner could owe $400,000 on a home that is only valued in today’s market for $300,000.

Income verification is required for the HARP refinance program. If  the original mortgage was underwritten and funded,  as a a stated income loan, the borrower will have to provide proof of income to be approved for a new HARP loan.

There are substantial "risk-based" origination fees, for new loans with a term exceeding 20 years.  Those "risk-based" origination fees are waived for terms of twenty years or less.  The reasoning behind that guideline is that a lower rate, with a lower term, should not have a material impact on the payment amount when compared to the existing payment.  The accelerated amortization however, should establish equity for the home owner more quickly and reduce the risk to the government-insuring entity.

If the existing loan doesn’t require PMI (Private Mortgage Insurance), the new loan won’t require it either.  If  the existing loan requires PMI , there will be no change to that PMI however, the “transfer” of your mortgage insurance policy may require an extra step. Make sure that I know that you currently pay PMI and tell me that amount.

FHA , USDA, and VA loans are ineligible for HARP.  Only loans, which were sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, prior to May 31, 2009 are eligible.  This means that it is highly likely that loans closed,  in 2009 or thereafter, are ineligible.  To determine if you are HARP ekigible, check these two sites:

http://www.FannieMae.com/loanlookup/ 

https://ww3.FreddieMac.com/corporate/

HARP is not designed to delay, or stop, foreclosures. It’s meant to give homeowners who are current on their mortgages, and who have lost home equity, a chance to refinance at today’s low mortgage rates.  Home owners may not have used the HARP program before and must be current on thier mortgage to refinance via HARP.  Borrowers may not have had any late payments in the last six months.

Only rate-and-term refinances are allowable. No cash out refinances are allowed.  Borrowers can refinance an investment property or vacation home with HARP, even if the home was once a primary residence.  Condominiums can be financed on the HARP refinance program but the lender will require that all warranties from the HOA are satisfied.

HARP refinances first liens only. All junior liens must be subordinated to the new first mortgage. Mortgage balances can be increased to cover closing costs but loan amounts may not exceed the local conforming loan limits ($625,000).

If you are HARP-eligible, you must close on your mortgage prior to January 1, 2014.  Please call me today, at (858)-777-9751, so we can determine your eligibility, qualify you for a HARP refinance, and take advantage of the program as soon as it is authorized for fundings.

San Diego Housing Approaches Rent Vs. Own Parity

Should you buy a home or rent one, in San Diego? 

As always, that depends.  If you're looking for a home in La Jolla, you may never find a one which is less expensive to own than rent, in today's dollars.  The physical beauty of the seaside burg is stunning and La Jolla has traditionally traded at a steep premium to rent v. own parity.

Nick Timiraos suggested that buying conditions are getting better for San Diego, in the Wall Street Journal:

Home ownership is also looking more affordable because after several years of declines, apartment rents will rise by around 4% this year, says Mr. Nadji. He says rents are poised "to pick up even more momentum across the country next year."

Rising rents are one reason a would-be home buyer should consider purchasing a La Jolla home rather than waiting for prices to reach parity there.  If inflation kicks in, and onc day it will, rents could increase a level far above what the mortgage payment, for a La Jolla home, would be today.

Even cities where it is still cheaper to rent than own have seen big boosts in affordability. In San Diego, the monthly cost of owning a home has averaged around 83% more than renting over the past two decades. During the third quarter, owning was 22% more expensive than renting, according to John Burns Real Estate Consulting

Take note of this figure.  In many San Diego sub-markets, (mostly the beach cities), housing prices will never reach parity with today's rents.  Like the La Jolla example, inlaftion may cure that in 2-3 years.  Still, some San Diego County markets have already reached parity meaning, it's cheaper to own rather than rent.  Even in some beach cities, like Oceanside or Imperial Beach.

I searched active Oceanside homes for sale and found one which is listed for $189,000.  With about $7,000 down payment,  and an FHA loan with a 4.88% APR, the monthly mortgage payment would be $1250, some $50-$100 below what it might fetch in rent.  That's one of many Oceanside properties which are at or below parity for the rent V own model.

I also found plenty of similar opportunities while searching for homes for sale in Chula Vista.  There were many more recently built homes, which command premium rents, listed under $250,000.

San Diego entrepreneur Bill Lyons intends to make these home searches easier when he releases his new website, Revestor.com.  Revestor organizes current listings, by capitalization rate or cash flow, to offer homeowners a chance to "rate" properties, by comparing the listed price to current rental data.

San Diego is still selling at a slight premium but this may be as good as it gets.  If mortgage rates continue to stay low, because of the Fed's printing press and quantitative easing, the bubble for low rates will soon pop, and inflation will kick in.  Locking in a price, and a low mortgage rate, might be the best way to insure you won a piece of our sunshiney paradise.

Lower VA Mortgage Funding Fees Implemented November 18, 2011

N.B:  On the day before I published this, HR 674 passed, reverting the funding fee amounts to the “old” levels.  It was updated in VA Circular 26-11-19, published November 22, 2011.  The “new” lower funding fee schedule was in effect for three days, from Nov 18-21.  Sorry for the confusion.

The Veterans  Administration lowered the funding fee it charges, to insure loans made to active-duty or retired military personnel.    The new funding fee schedule distinguishes first-time users and repeat users and between active-duty, reservists, prior military.

Can you use your VA loan guaranty benefit more than once?

Of course you can.  The VA even allows for two outstanding loans (under certain circumstances) but generally, veterans can only have one VA loan outstanding.  A common misunderstanding is that a veteran can only use a VA loan once.  The benefit can be used as many times as the veteran wishes.

Can you still get a zero-down VA home loan, again?

Indeed you can.  The new funding fee schedule, for zero-down loan purchases, is only 1.40% for first-time users who are active-duty veterans and 1.65% for reservist/guardsmen veterans. Zero-down home loans, for the second and subsequent VA home loans, require a 2.8% funding fee for all veterans:  active duty, reservists, and guardsmen.

Can you lower the funding fee if you use a down payment?

Yes you can.  If veteran home buyers put 5% down, with a VA loan, the funding fee drops to .75% for active duty veterans (1.0% for reservists and guardsmen).  For a 10% down payment, the funding fee drops to .5% for active-duty veterans and .75% for reservists and guardsmen.

Here is a list of the current and new VA funding fees scheduled to take effect on November 18, 2011.

Use/Purpose	Down Payment	Active Duty Veteran		Reservist/National Guard
		Old	New	Old	New
First Time	Less than 5%*	2.15%	1.40%	2.40%	1.65%
First Time	5% - 9.99%	1.50%	0.75%	1.75%	1.00%
First Time	10% or more	1.25%	0.50%	1.50%	0.75%
Subsequent	Less than 5%*	3.30%	2.80%	3.30%	2.80%
Subsequent	5% - 9.99%	1.50%	0.75%	1.75%	1.00%
Subsequent	10% or more	1.25%	0.50%	1.50%	0.75%
Interest Rate Reduction	N/A	0.50%	0.50%	0.50%	0.50%
Assumptions	N/A	0.50%	0.50%	0.50%	0.50%

 

Proposed Good Faith Estimate Should Be More Consumer Friendly

The Consumer Financial Protection Agency just released its proposed Good Faith Estimate (GFE) disclosure form.  The form will combine the best parts of the original GFE (which we still issue) along with the "new" GFE (which is confusing and we issue, per disclosure regulations).

This six-minute video will walk you through it:

Owner-Occupancy Ratio in Condominium Complexes

"A big Bank in America declined my loan application because the condominium complex owner-occupancy density was too low.  I have great credit, five times the payment in monthly income, and I"ve saved my own money up.  How can I get a mortgage to buy this condominium?" 

Let's start by explaining why the big banks in America are declining these loan applications.  While you are an excellent borrower, the collateral, in this case, the property, is part of a  common-interest development (that's lender-speak for condominiums, co-operatives, and planned unit developments).  What that means is that the property you are purchasing is subject to a layer of "opt-in governance" and the composition of the "opt-in entity" could have material effects on the value of the properties in that "opt-in entity".

That was a lot of fancy speak for this statement; a high percentage of renters is less desirable because the owners of the property (investors) have less "emotional interest" than  owners who would make the property his/her home.

Stated differently, an investor-owner is less likely to pay his/her HOA dues, if he/her ran into financial difficulty, than an owner who makes the property his/her home.  It's a risk factor.

Does that mean its a dead-deal?

Absolutely not.  We can make loans on those condominiums if the purchaser puts 25% down payment and plans to make the property his/her home. 

If the property is approved by the Veterans Administration, and the buyer has eligibility for a VA home loan, the owner-occupancy issue is a moot point; the VA doesn't consider owner-occupancy to be a risk factor.

If the buyer wants to pursue an FHA loan, and the complex needs FHA approval, the owner-occupancy density  must be 51%.

Owner-occupany is not the only reason a property in a common-interest development might be declined for high, loan-to-value mortgages.  HOA financial stability, pending litigation, reserve and repair plans, and general maintanance all come into play.  I'll discuss those, in more detail, on this site, later.

VA Home Loans, FHA Mortgages and a Government Shutdown

Congress is quibbling about the size of the token cut to the federal budget,  The stalemate could force a shutdown of the federal government.  How will that affect VA home loans, FHA mortgages, and conventional residential loans?

VA home loans are insured by the Veterans Adminsitration which receives its annual appropriation in advance.  As such, most veterans services, including VA home loans, are funded through FY 2011.  It is beleived that VA home loans will still be insured for the next 8 months and no interruption will occur.

Conventional mortgages require a 20% down payment and, as such, should be unaffacted by the shut down.  Lenders can and will "warehouse" those loans until the can be sold, in bulk, to Wall Street.

FHA mortgage fundings may be arrested during a federal government shutdown. FHA mortgages are insured by the Federal Housing Adminsitration (a division of the Department of Housing and Urban Development).  All functions of that department are considered "non-essential" so it is believed that FHA will cease operations.  Lenders can (and some may will) fund FHA loans, for a short period of time, in anticipation of obtaining the FHA insuarance in the near-term future but it is unlikely they would continue to fund beyond the end of the month.

What does this mean to you?  Lenders will probably be very choosy with the loans they fund.  We could see them refuse to take normal risks and susoend or decline loans which are not "plain vanilla" files.  HIgher debt-to-income ratios, marginal credit scores, and unclear exceptions to the FHA guidelines will most likely be shunned during a government shutdown.

 

FHA Monthly Premiums Likely To Rise April 1, 2011

Remember when the FHA monthly mortgage insurance premiums rose from .5%(annual) to .9%(annual) ?  The NAR kicked and screamed about housing affordability but the move was made to shore up the ailing HUD reserves.  What many folks missed was that HR 5981 allowed for an increase for an annual premium of 1.55%:

The bill has already passed the house. The bill (H.R. 5981) allows FHA to raise its annual premium to 1.55% from 0.55%. Approved by unanimous consent, the legislation now goes to the White House for the president’s signature.

I haven’t decided that this is a good thing to happen to mortgage lending or a bad thing. One of the determining factors for me will be how much of the authorized increase FHA determines they will actually take. If they take the full 1.55%, it will literally take about 25% of the buyers out of the market.

According to the National Mortgage News, “With this new authority, FHA will lower its 2.25% upfront premium to 1%, but then raise the current 55 basis point annual premium, basing the hikes on loan-to-value ratios. FHA wants to raise the annual premium to 85 bps for loans with LTVs of up to, and including 95%, and to 90 bps for loans with LTVs above 95%.”

Well, it looks like HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan has decided to raise the FHA premium again:

Higher FHA Insurance. "As Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's presence in the market shrinks, we will encourage program changes at FHA to ensure that the private sector – not FHA – picks up this new market share," states the Treasury plan. In addition to the change in loan limits, the Administration will put in place a 25 basis point increase in the price of FHA's annual mortgage insurance premium, which is paid in 12 monthly installments. FHA just increased the annual MIP payment to .85 percent last October. The new rate will be 1.10 percent. FHA currently accounts for 30 to 40 percent of all new purchase mortgages, and more than half of all mortgages taken out by first-time buyers.

What does that mean to the average FHA borrower, taking out a $300,000 loan in San Diego County?

• Six months ago, the FHA mortgage insurance premium would have been $125.00.
• As of October 1, 2010(and currently), that FHA monthly premium would be $225.00
• After April 1, 2011, expect that FHA monthly insurance premium to be $287.50.

It's more than doubled.  Can you blame HUD though?  As Greg Swann writes, while the Obama Adminsitration says they want to wind down the government's role in housing finance, it appears they just want to shift the responsibility to a growing agency.  That's not helpful for a sustainable recovery in mortgage financing.  Until the government completely withdrawals from housing finance, private lenders have no incentive to come up with a solution.

 

FHA Flips Permitted Throughout 2011

From David Mikkelson:

The Federal Housing Administration has extended FHA's temporary waiver of the agency's 'anti-flipping rule.'  

With certain exceptions, FHA regulations prohibit insuring a mortgage on a home owned by the seller for less than 90 days.  Early last year, FHA temporarily waived this regulation through January 31, 2011.  FHA today posted a notice extending this waiver through the remainder of 2011.  This action will permit buyers to continue to use FHA-insured financing to purchase HUD-owned properties, bank-owned properties, or properties resold through private sales. It will allow homes to resell as quickly as possible, helping to stabilize real estate prices and to revitalize neighborhoods and communities.

The extension announced today is effective through December 31, 2011, unless otherwise extended or withdrawn by FHA.  All other terms of the waiver will remain the same. The waiver contains strict conditions and guidelines to assure that predatory practices are not allowed.

To protect FHA borrowers against predatory practices of "flipping" where properties are quickly resold at inflated prices to unsuspecting borrowers, this waiver continues to be limited to those sales meeting the following general conditions:

• All transactions must be arms-length, with no identity of interest between the buyer and seller or other parties participating in the sales transaction.
• In cases in which the sales price of the property is 20 percent or more above the seller's acquisition cost, the waiver will only apply if the lender meets specific conditions.

The waiver is limited to forward mortgages, and does not apply to the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) for purchase program.

2011 VA Loan Limits for San Diego, Orange, and Los Angeles Counties

San Diego 2011 VA loan limits increased to $537,500 while Los Angeles and Orange counties had a slight decrease to $700,000.  Riverside, San Bernandino, and Imperial counties remain at $417,000. These limits are the maximum base mortgage amount for a zero-down VA home loan.  The 2011 VA loan limits for all California counties:

• ALAMEDA $1,000,000
  ALPINE $480,000
  CONTRA COSTA $1,000,000
  LOS ANGELES $700,000
  MARIN $1,000,000
  MONTEREY $431,250
  NAPA $530,000
  NEVADA $431,250
  ORANGE $700,000
  SAN BENITO $843,750
  SAN DIEGO $537,500
  SAN FRANCISCO $1,000,000
  SAN LUIS OBISPO $528,750
  SAN MATEO $1,000,000
  SANTA BARBARA $710,000
  SANTA CLARA $843,750
  SANTA CRUZ $706,250
• SONOMA $478,750
  VENTURA $562,500

Five counties, in the San Francisco Bay area remained at a $1,000,000 VA loan limit.