BradyLoan.com

Wht China Matters to Southern California Real Estate

You have heard me talk about China and it's effect on California real estate a lot.   Just two years ago,  I was on TV, talking about the oversized influence Chinese nationals had on Southern California real estate.  Since then, a trade war with China escalated and the Chinese government cracked down on capital leaving Mainland China. The result has been lower mortgage rates and lower real estate prices in areas where Chinese nationals were buying properties.

Chinese buyers aren't as active as they were two years ago:

A big reason Chinese investors are retreating from the American housing market is that Beijing has placed tight limits on how much capital can leave the country in the wake of a devaluation in the yuan a few years ago. 

“In China, each family member has been restricted to $50,000 or less,” says Steven Ho, senior loan officer at Quontic, a New York City-based bank. That makes it tougher for Chinese investors to elbow out American buyers with all-cash offers.“A few years before, these restrictions were not so stringent.”

The government toughened capital controls last year as the Chinese economy weakened, Ho says.

Also, China's slowing economy itself has dampened the confidence and purchasing appetite of Chinese buyers, Yun says. The Trump administration's trade war with China, he says, has further chilled investment in U.S. housing.  

Meanwhile, more Chinese homeowners have been selling their American houses and condos because they can’t pay the maintenance costs with their money trapped in China, says Jeff Lu, vice president of Fidelity National Title Insurance.

President Trump's tariff war, with China, is causing global unrest.  Investors are flocking the US treasury bonds, driving US mortgage rates lower:

U.S. Treasury yields have plunged since the July meeting and the gap between 2-year and 10-year yields has inverted, a typically reliable indicator of an impending recession.

Thirty-year mortgage rates have dropped about 100 basis points since late last year and are expected to stay below 4% over the next several years, around 60 basis points lower than forecast just three months ago.

You may love or hate China.  You may love or hate Trump.  You can hold either or both opinions but to ignore Chinese buyers of real estate or US treasury securities is to let youor opinion cloud your judgement when making a real estate purchase

San Diego Mortgage Rates Report: July 10, 2013

Independence Day meant more things than barbecues, beer, and baseball this year.  Mortgage bond investors didn't like the idea of independence from Federal Reserve Bank subsidies.

Just before the holiday, I suggested that the Fed was sending stabilizing signals that the quantitative easing programs wouldn't be completely abandoned.  Last week, there was only one fear; the non-farm payrolls report released on Friday (July 5, 2013).  That report exceeded expectations and the mortgage bond market nearly collapsed-- rates spiked to as high as 4.875% for conventional loans and 4.75% for VA/FHA loans.

One thing which contributed to Friday's volatility was that it was a day after a holiday.  The trading desks operated with skeleton crews of junior traders, most of which were nervously selling befoe the weekend.  When their senior colleagues returned on Monday, they saw buying opportunities in mortgage bonds.  The mortgage bond market recovered a bit more than half of its losses, in two trading sessions, and rates settled in at 4.625% for conventional loans and 4.5% for VA/FHA.  Today, the mortgage bond market is slightly off on news that wholesale investory stocks are being depeleted.

All eyes were on the release of the June meeting of the FOMC minutes.  The consensus is that the bad news is already out and, since the Fed Governors are split on the idea of QE tapering, the bond market is getting used to the idea that Fed action (or inaction) won't ruin the bond market.

Where do we go from here?

I look to investment adviser Lenore Hawkins a lot.  She and I both share free market views and she has a good understanding of how non-subsidized economies should act.  From her July newsletter:

While many are criticizing the Fed for the tumult the comments caused in the markets, we think they ought to be applauded for injecting uncertainty into a market that was becoming entirely too complacent about the degree of excessive leverage being used to combat the low rates of return imposed by the Fed’s financial repression.

As we delve deeper into the data,  and you knew we were going to go there, the job growth continues to be among lower quality jobs.  The unemployment rate held steady at 7.6%, but the U6 (broader employment metric) jumped from 13.8% to 14.3% caused by a surge in part-time work.  Full-time jobs dropped by 240k and in fact, since the start of the year only 130k full-time jobs have been added while 557k part-time jobs have been added.  The unemployment rate would today be 11.1% if the participation rate was the same as it was pre-recession.  Despite the headlines, Main Street is still struggling.

I agree with Lenore--the grass isn't necessarily greener in this economy...yet.  As economic data materialize this summer, we may realize that the QE bond buying program is (a) ineffective and (b) causing little asset bubbles (think real estate prices in San Diego)--a classic case of the unintended consequences of bad monetary policy.

I thnk we're at a crossroads of a mini-panic.  The higher mortgage rates have certainly slowed mortgage applications, listings aren't moving as quickly as they did 4-5 months ago, and sellers are rushing to list homes for fear that higher mortgage rates will tank the real estate market.

The Fed isn't going to let mortgage rates tank the real estate market.  Bernanke sees a housing rebound as essential to a broader-based economic recovery.  On the other hand, Bernanke understands that QE has to end...eventually.

This summer should continue to be choppy.  I expect the mortgage bond market to bounce around a lot this summer as we all get used to a "new normal".  That "new normal should have mortgage rates bouncing from as low as 4.25% up to 5%.  Currently, best-execution conventional rates are around 4.625% and best execution VA/FHA rates are around 4.5%.  Jumbo rates are still over one percentage point higher with executions in the 5.75%-6.125% range

As volatility is the word of the summer, I still advise home buyers to lock-in rates at application--floating is just too risky.

San Diego Housing Approaches Rent Vs. Own Parity

Should you buy a home or rent one, in San Diego? 

As always, that depends.  If you're looking for a home in La Jolla, you may never find a one which is less expensive to own than rent, in today's dollars.  The physical beauty of the seaside burg is stunning and La Jolla has traditionally traded at a steep premium to rent v. own parity.

Nick Timiraos suggested that buying conditions are getting better for San Diego, in the Wall Street Journal:

Home ownership is also looking more affordable because after several years of declines, apartment rents will rise by around 4% this year, says Mr. Nadji. He says rents are poised "to pick up even more momentum across the country next year."

Rising rents are one reason a would-be home buyer should consider purchasing a La Jolla home rather than waiting for prices to reach parity there.  If inflation kicks in, and onc day it will, rents could increase a level far above what the mortgage payment, for a La Jolla home, would be today.

Even cities where it is still cheaper to rent than own have seen big boosts in affordability. In San Diego, the monthly cost of owning a home has averaged around 83% more than renting over the past two decades. During the third quarter, owning was 22% more expensive than renting, according to John Burns Real Estate Consulting

Take note of this figure.  In many San Diego sub-markets, (mostly the beach cities), housing prices will never reach parity with today's rents.  Like the La Jolla example, inlaftion may cure that in 2-3 years.  Still, some San Diego County markets have already reached parity meaning, it's cheaper to own rather than rent.  Even in some beach cities, like Oceanside or Imperial Beach.

I searched active Oceanside homes for sale and found one which is listed for $189,000.  With about $7,000 down payment,  and an FHA loan with a 4.88% APR, the monthly mortgage payment would be $1250, some $50-$100 below what it might fetch in rent.  That's one of many Oceanside properties which are at or below parity for the rent V own model.

I also found plenty of similar opportunities while searching for homes for sale in Chula Vista.  There were many more recently built homes, which command premium rents, listed under $250,000.

San Diego entrepreneur Bill Lyons intends to make these home searches easier when he releases his new website, Revestor.com.  Revestor organizes current listings, by capitalization rate or cash flow, to offer homeowners a chance to "rate" properties, by comparing the listed price to current rental data.

San Diego is still selling at a slight premium but this may be as good as it gets.  If mortgage rates continue to stay low, because of the Fed's printing press and quantitative easing, the bubble for low rates will soon pop, and inflation will kick in.  Locking in a price, and a low mortgage rate, might be the best way to insure you won a piece of our sunshiney paradise.

Jumbo Mortgage Rates Report- July 5, 2011

Why do La Jolla, CA home buyers keep watching the riots in Greece?

Once again Greece threatened default on its soveriegn deb.  This sent shockwaves through the world financial markets.  This time around, the European Union was offering less solidarity and more austerity to its little peninsular cousin.  Capital fled European markets and into American treasury bonds during the middle of June.  This drove bond yields down which caused jumbo mortgage rates to decline to their lowest levels since 2004.

Last Monday, we locked a $500,000 loan, at 4.75% (30 year fixed), with no fees or discount points.  We locked a $1.1 million loan at 5.125% (30 year fixed), with no fees or discount points.  Today, those same loans would be more expensive by a discount point (1% of the loan amount).  This means that the first buyer would have to bring an extra $5,000 to closing today, and the second buyer would have to bring $11,000 to closing today , just to get the same rates.

Why are jumbo mortgage loans so much more expensive today than they were last Monday?  Greece struck a deal with the European Union to get emergency loans.  That action reassured golbal financial markets that a Greece default would be stayed.  Money flowed into equities and out of the safe haven of US Government securities.  Mortgage bond investors demanded higher yields from mortgage originators which was passed onto the retial borrower.

In which direction will jumbo mortgage rates head this summer?  I believe rates will be stable through Labor Day with some erratic movements upwards.  The federal Reserve bank has halted its quantitative easing plan.  While this should pressure jumbo mortgage rates higher, Greece is but the first of many sovereign default crises bubbling beneath the surface of a calm Mediterranean Sea.  I expect those threats of crises will hold the upwards pressure in check. 

If you can, lock a jumbo mortgage rate under 5%.  If higher than 5% is offered, you might pause to read what's happening in Europe.  Anothe ron of these crises could afford you that rate under 5%.

Proposed Good Faith Estimate Should Be More Consumer Friendly

The Consumer Financial Protection Agency just released its proposed Good Faith Estimate (GFE) disclosure form.  The form will combine the best parts of the original GFE (which we still issue) along with the "new" GFE (which is confusing and we issue, per disclosure regulations).

This six-minute video will walk you through it:

Government-Sponsored, Sub Prime Mortgages Coming Soon

Just in case you missed how horrendous the results of centralized, government planned, sub-prime, mortgage industry were, the Kommisars have decided to....

  ...create a sub-prime mortgage industry?  From the Boston Herald:

But some of the other requirements that federal agencies and the Obama administration are proposing in the same plan have gotten much less attention yet could prove just as troublesome for consumers:

•Strict mandatory debt-to-income limits. Under the proposal, to get the best mortgage rates, you would need to spend no more than 28% of your gross monthly income on housing-related expenses, and you couldn't have total monthly household debt that exceeds 36% of your income.

There would be no flexibility to go beyond these ceilings, unlike in today's marketplace, in which Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac consider debt-to-income ratios along with other factors through their electronic underwriting systems. Freddie Mac, for example, has an overall debt-ratio limit of 45% of an applicant's stable monthly income.

•To refinance your existing mortgage and replace it with one carrying the best interest rate, you'd need no less than a 25% equity stake in your house to qualify. If you sought to take any additional cash out through a refi, you would need 30% equity. Today's typical requirements for a conventional refi are nowhere near as strict.

•Pristine credit standards. For example, if you were 60 days late on any credit account during the previous 24 months, you would be ineligible for a mortgage at the best terms.

These are all core features of what may be the most sweeping and controversial set of changes in decades for the housing and mortgage markets. The so-called "qualified residential mortgage," or QRM, proposals were released at the end of March by banking, securities and housing regulators, along with the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The agencies were required by the 2010 financial reform legislation to come up with new standards for low-risk conventional mortgages.

Of course, this isn't being sold as a creation of a new sub-prime mortgage industry but simply rewarding those who have the money, credit history, and income to qualify for the best mortgage terms.  Wait a minute!  Isn't that what banks are supposed to do?  Aren't bank underwriting departments supposed to analyze risk, assess a commensurate return required for that risk, and offer loan terms?

This is MORE centrailized planning and it won't work because it never does.  Scream if you want but there is nothing you can do about it.  This Administration rules with an iron fist and Wall Street, and the banking cartel are being guaranteed profits by eliminating any competitiion.  These proposed rules will stifle any form of innovation in residential real estate finance.  This is Rotarian Socialism at it's finest and, as Greg Swann says, "It's evil dressed up in a Brooks Brothers suit"

The only way to save the mortgage industry is to break up the big banks, deregulate completely, which means abolishing the FDIC depositor insurance, and letting the free market determine interest rates, risk analysis, and loan terms.  If you want a robust economic recovery, get rid of this adolescent President, his Soviet-style Adminsitration, and demand an abolishment or (at the very least) completely transparent central bank (the Fed).

Can you imagine if the Kommisars regulated green beans the way they regulate your money? 

Oh wait...never mind. 

Picture credit icanhascheeseburger.com

VA Home Loans, FHA Mortgages and a Government Shutdown

Congress is quibbling about the size of the token cut to the federal budget,  The stalemate could force a shutdown of the federal government.  How will that affect VA home loans, FHA mortgages, and conventional residential loans?

VA home loans are insured by the Veterans Adminsitration which receives its annual appropriation in advance.  As such, most veterans services, including VA home loans, are funded through FY 2011.  It is beleived that VA home loans will still be insured for the next 8 months and no interruption will occur.

Conventional mortgages require a 20% down payment and, as such, should be unaffacted by the shut down.  Lenders can and will "warehouse" those loans until the can be sold, in bulk, to Wall Street.

FHA mortgage fundings may be arrested during a federal government shutdown. FHA mortgages are insured by the Federal Housing Adminsitration (a division of the Department of Housing and Urban Development).  All functions of that department are considered "non-essential" so it is believed that FHA will cease operations.  Lenders can (and some may will) fund FHA loans, for a short period of time, in anticipation of obtaining the FHA insuarance in the near-term future but it is unlikely they would continue to fund beyond the end of the month.

What does this mean to you?  Lenders will probably be very choosy with the loans they fund.  We could see them refuse to take normal risks and susoend or decline loans which are not "plain vanilla" files.  HIgher debt-to-income ratios, marginal credit scores, and unclear exceptions to the FHA guidelines will most likely be shunned during a government shutdown.

 

January, 2010 Mortgage Rates Should Start Climb To 6%

December, 2009 mortgage rates have been quite volatile.  We started the month out with conventional rates as low as 4.5% (with an origination fee) and today, that same loan is offered at 5.0%  Throughout 2009, I reported that this was a classic overreaction, by the MBS traders and changed my posture to float rather than lock rates in at application.  That worked for 2009 but won't for 2010.

For those of you who have followed me on Twitter or Facebook, you've seen that I have been recommending borrowers to lock-in rates at loan application rather than "playing the market", for the past six weeks.  This rapid rise can be attributed to one thing; it's an answer to a comment investments broker, Jeff Brown made yesterday.  Jeff said:

I don't think it's the beginning of the climb yet. Uncle Ben is still doin' his thing with much vigor.

Jeff, Uncle Ben ain't got no mo' vigor; he's out of Viagra.  I tried to explain this phenomenon over on Active Rain, last night:

Markets are discounting mechanisms meaning that traders anticipate how potent the Fed can be.  The Fed's just about out of bullets and MBS traders know it.  Let me try to give you an example of what the Fed did by recanting the explanation I gave, to a Del Mar REALTOR, on the beach this summer.

I had my daughter (Maggie) get me ten cups of water from the ocean.  Then I drew six lines in the sand, equidistant from each other, and labeled them 6% (on the right) through 4.5% (on the left). I had Maggie stand at 6% and explained that this represented Dec, 2008 mortgage rates.  I announced that my intention was to throw water at her until she moves to the left, away from 6% and towards 4.5%.  I grabbed two cups and threw one at her, then at the line marked 5.5%; Maggie quickly darted to the left. 

Then, I threw a cup at her every time she inched to the right.  I explained that Maggie was acting EXACTLY like the MBS traders, naturally gravitating towards the "natural" market.  Each time I chucked a cup full of"stimulus", Maggie moved back under 5% and closer to 4.5%.  Once, she got real daring (like the MBS market this past summer) and I threw three cups at her.

At the beginning of December, The Fed had two cups of water.  Now, they only have 1.5 cups of stimulus left.

Even if the Fed announces an extension of the MBS purchase program, bond traders might view this an inflationary (printing money to buy money) and reject the Fed's efforts to control mortgage rates.  If bond traders push up yields on US Treasury securities, because they believe the Fed and Congress are borrowing and printing money irresponsibly, no amount of support will work.  The only weapon left in Uncle Ben's arsenal will be a form of wage/price controls; that didn't work 35 years ago and won't work today.

I might be early but I think the risk of a quick jump in rates is MUCH greater than the opportunity of slightly lower ones.  My bias is towards locking all loans at application.  We may see an opportunity to float in the next few months, if markets overreact but I doubt it.

Get a customized mortgage rate quote today.

June 17, 2009 Mortgage Rates Report: Approaching 5.0%

Mortgage rates have improved since last Friday.  I felt we could delay locks (float) in hopes of better rates and that's proved to be fruitful. Lock-in your mortgage rate on the strength of this improvement.

Inflation doesn't appear to be a threat.  Yesterday's Producer Price Index reflected the threat of higher oil prices but came in within reason; the mortgage bonds market liked what it saw.  The Consumer Price Index, released this morning, was well under expectations; this should be positive for mortgage bonds and could lead to lower rates.

I expect our morning rate sheets (no points, 1% origination fee) to look something like this:

Conv        5.125%
FHA          5.25% 
VA             5.25% 

Next week's Fed meeting could stifle speculation that it will hike interest rates later this year:

Federal Reserve officials are considering whether to use next week’s policy statement to suppress any speculation they’re prepared to raise interest rates as soon as this year.

While policy makers have signaled they accept an increase in longer-term Treasury yields as the economy improves, some are concerned at any premature anticipation of rate rises. Fed staff have examined the Bank of Canada’s public intention of foregoing an increase until 2010, according to a person familiar with the matter, without concluding the statement has proven effective.

I have mixed feelings about the Fed adopting a policy akin to the Bank of Canada's rate commitment.  Markets crave stability but react to reassuring news in a volatile fashion.  I wouldn't be surprised to see mortgage bonds decline on such news; traders might think the Fed has abandoned its commitment to taming inflation.  Counter-intuitive thinking?  Absolutely but reason and rational thought sometimes give way to fear.

I'll update rates later, if necessary.

Apply online now.  It's really simple and should take about 20 minutes.

 

What Wired Mortgage Brokers Are Saying About June Mortgage Rates

The first week in June inspires thoughts of lazy afternoons on the beach, stunning sunsets, camping, and family vacations.  The mercury on the thermometer is not the only thing rising; so are retail mortgage rates.  If you've been reading, you'll notice that mortgage rates jumped almost one full percentage point since Memorial Day weekend.

It spooked me to the point of changing my overall bias towards locking-in loans at application rather than cautiously floating rates to try and "snag the bottom".  Here's a look at what mortgage professionals who maintain an online presence are saying:

Dan Green from Cincinnati highlights why folks should shop for lenders, not loans:

The frenzied pace of change is making it next to impossible for mortgage applicants shop for "the lowest mortgage rate".  By the time a buyer talks to competing lenders and gather the rate quotes, it's time to start the process over again.  It's giving Skyline-style heartburn to home buyers in Cincinnati, for one.

Rhonda Porter from Seattle ponders a penniless Fed, still trying to keep rates low:

The New York Fed purchased another $25.8B in mortgage backed securites to attempt to keep rates at their artifical lows…it makes me wonder how much higher today’s rates would be if when they run out of the allocated funds or if they just decide to change plans and stop buying MBS.

Justin McHood in Phoenix reminds us that higher mortgage rates mean less buying power:

Although I don’t remember what 10%-20% interest rates felt like, I can remember well what 7% interest rates felt like – it wasn’t that long ago! If interest rates rise to 7%, the P/I payment on a $200k loan will go up by $327 per month.

Are we going to see 10% interest rates in the foreseeable future? I don’t know, I will leave that to the experts to pontificate about. What I can say for certain though is that as interest rates rise, people are going to buy “less of a house” than they are currently buying.

Orlando's Chris Brown explains why you have to shop for a loan quickly:

As markets worsened, selling begat more selling, amplifying Wall Street’s total losses. As mortgage bond prices fell, mortgage rates went up. By a lot.

Mortgage markets are notoriously fickle and yesterday’s events proved it. Days like Wednesday are precisely why insiders recommend shopping for mortgage rates in a compressed timeframe. The faster you finish, the lower the risk of losing low interest rates to new market conditions.

If you're shopping for a home loan, you can see that the loan quotes you receive are less important than the lender who issues them.  Find a lender with whom you feel comfortable.  If you choose to work with me, you can:

Apply online now.  It's really simple and should take about 20 minutes.